Consolidating police agencies www datingvranel com
All methods emphasize economical savings and ultimately aim to reduce the inefficiencies and difficulties that plague a fragmented system.
A unified structure poses other benefits, such as consistent training and protocols for policing activities, pooling of resources, and the elimination of duplicative operational and administrative costs.
A Police Executive Research Forum study for Pennsylvania’s own Dauphin County suggested that reorganizing police departments could save between 5,000 to over million.
Consolidation could also result in a loss of local autonomy over how the community wants to be policed, and it can erode the community values instilled and enforced by the local police departments.
In a merger of Kentucky police departments, nearly million was spent on radios alone to ensure the police department could operate cohesively.
A fragmented police system is problematic to say the least.
Given the realities, consolidation is a means of achieving cost-efficiency to improve the quality of law enforcement across the board.
“Consolidation” does not necessarily mean a full-scale merger resulting in a complete loss of a department’s autonomy.
Part of the reason laws are codified is to provide uniform information and enforcement measures, and so society is aware of what the rules are.